Identification and verification
Detail
Identifies the user against your directory or CMDB and confirms company, contracted service and applicable support tier before touching the problem.
Technical support and helpdesk
Most helpdesk volume is level 1: work out who is calling, understand what is broken, open the ticket. Necessary work, but not technical work. Elop handles that stretch and escalates only what genuinely needs a person — with the context already structured in the ticket.

It is not that you are short of engineers. It is that engineers are doing work that does not require an engineer.
A helpdesk call curve is brutally uneven: half an hour carries what takes three hours to arrive at any other time. Staffing for the peak is expensive; not staffing for it puts everyone in a queue.
Either you pay for idle capacity or you miss first-response SLA.
The peak stops being a staffing problem: there is no queue.
Who you are, which company, which service, since when, what the message says exactly. Two or three minutes of data collection before anyone can think about the problem.
Engineer minutes multiplied by every call of the day.
Identification and data capture arrive already done, in the ticket.
A password reset, an account unlock or a service restart are scripted incidents. When a second-line engineer handles them, cost per ticket goes through the roof.
Expensive profiles working through a manual.
Incidents with a procedure close without touching second line.
A ticket opened in a hurry reaches the engineer without the key detail, so the user has to be called back. That bounce is one of the main reasons resolution time balloons.
Reopens, callbacks and SLA at risk.
The ticket arrives with symptom, verbatim message and steps already tried.
Covering nights and weekends means building a rota or outsourcing to a call centre that does not know your systems and escalates nearly everything.
High cost for low but critical volume.
Nights and weekends covered with the same escalation criteria.
A good share of inbound calls are not new incidents at all: they are people asking about the status of a ticket that already exists.
Call volume that adds nothing to the service.
Status enquiries resolve themselves, occupying nobody on the team.
Full level 1, with the output written into your system. We do not deliver a transcript — we deliver a qualified ticket.
Identifies the user against your directory or CMDB and confirms company, contracted service and applicable support tier before touching the problem.
Determines category, urgency and impact by asking what a level-1 agent would ask, and applies your priority matrix to put the ticket in the right queue.
Creates the ticket with the structured fields your team needs: affected service, symptom, verbatim error message, steps already tried, and when it started.
Password reset, account unlock, service restart, connectivity checks, status verification. Flows already documented in your knowledge base are executed on the call.
The user calls, identifies themselves, and the agent tells them where their incident stands and what happens next — without occupying anyone on the team.
Outbound calls to confirm resolution, verify the problem is gone, or warn of a scheduled maintenance window.
When the incident goes beyond level 1 the call reaches the engineer with the ticket already open and the conversation summarised. They start diagnosing instead of start asking.
A short call after resolution to measure satisfaction and catch badly closed incidents before they reopen.
We measure against the metrics your service already uses, not indicators invented for the occasion.
Wait time
The nine o’clock spike stops being a capacity problem: every call is answered at once.
Resolved without an engineer
Incidents with a documented procedure close on the call itself, consuming no second-line time.
Fewer callbacks to the user
The ticket reaches the engineer with structured information, cutting reopens caused by missing detail.
Cover without a rota
Nights and weekends covered by the same flow, with the same escalation criteria as office hours.
The value is not the conversation — it is the record left behind. Elop writes into the tool your team works in, with your fields and your taxonomy.
We work against your category taxonomy and your priority matrix, not a generic one. A ticket that does not fit the flow your team already uses is worth nothing.
IntegrationsLeave your number and call the helpdesk. Describe an incident the way it would be described to you — vagueness included.
The questions that come up as soon as you get into operational detail.
Because you define the closing criteria, flow by flow. The agent only resolves incidents with a documented procedure and an explicit verification that the problem is gone. In any doubt it escalates — we would rather have one escalation too many than one improper close, and we configure it that way.
That is normal, which is why the agent asks what a level 1 would ask: what the message says exactly, since when, whether others are affected, what has already been tried. It records the symptom verbatim and does not reinterpret it, which is precisely what makes the ticket useful to the engineer.
Yes. We configure category, urgency and impact against your matrix and your SLAs per customer or service. The agent does not invent a priority — it applies yours.
They are identified in triage and trigger whatever immediate escalation you define, including notifying the on-call team. Automation applies to repetitive volume, not to a crisis.
It absorbs the mechanical part of their work. The teams we work with move their level 1 towards higher-value work — documentation, improving procedures, looking after critical accounts — rather than cutting headcount.
The intake and triage flow goes into production once the ITSM integration is resolved. Guided resolution flows are added afterwards, one at a time, starting with the highest volume; the schedule is agreed with you.
The fastest way to see a return is to give Elop the highest-volume window and the out-of-hours window. With those two stretches measured, deciding what else to automate stops being a matter of opinion.